What Percent Of Products Are Tested On Animals
Hi kitties! Suzana here. I'm excited to share that our June Cruelty-Free Kitty box ships soon! This month'due south box contains a trunk sunscreen from Juice Beauty! Y'all tin subscribe here, but act quickly since boxes are limited.
This report covers:
- Animal testing policies of the fifty largest cosmetics companies
- The growth of the beauty market in China, a state with mandatory animal testing laws.
- The size of the global cruelty-free cosmetics market
- Animal testing policies of the 500 most popular brands on Cruelty-Costless Kitty
- Cruelty-costless and vegan preferences of cosmetics shoppers
- How many countries worldwide accept banned brute testing for cosmetics
- Animals used worldwide in lab experiments
The Top 50 Biggest Cosmetics Companies: Fauna Testing Statistics
Of the 50 largest cosmetics companies ranked past market place value as per Brand Finance in 2021, we found that 88% fund animal testing. This means that of these 50 companies, 44 are not cruelty-free. (1)
At the peak, L'Oréal, valued at USD $10.2B in 2021, is not a cruelty-free visitor. L'Oréal is followed by Gillette, Nivea, Guerlain, and Estee Lauder, none of which are cruelty-free companies. Other notable brands that fund creature testing include MAC, Lancôme, Pantene, Maybelline, Benefit, and Shiseido.
Out of the fifty top brands, merely 6 are cruelty-free: Garnier, who became Leaping Bunny-certified in March of 2021, Tresemme, who followed Garnier's footsteps in May of 2021, The Body Shop, which has been cruelty-free since the visitor started in 1976, too as Dove, Herbal Essences, and Sunsilk, who have taken PETA'southward cruelty-free pledge.
| Global Ranking | Brand | Cruelty-Free Status |
| #i | L'Oréal | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #ii | Gillette | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #3 | Nivea | Non Cruelty-Free |
| #4 | Guerlain | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #5 | Estée Lauder | Not Cruelty-Gratis |
| #6 | Pantene | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #7 | Pigeon | PETA-canonical |
| #8 | Clinique | Non Cruelty-Costless |
| #9 | Garnier | Cruelty-Free |
| #10 | Head & Shoulders | Non Cruelty-Free |
| #11 | Lancôme | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #12 | Thou.A.C | Not Cruelty-Complimentary |
| #thirteen | Maybelline | Not Cruelty-Costless |
| #14 | Johnson'southward | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #15 | PECHOIN | Not Cruelty-Fre |
| #xvi | Clarins | Not Cruelty-Costless |
| #17 | SK-II | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #18 | Procter & Take a chance | Not Cruelty-Gratis |
| #19 | Olay | Not Cruelty-Costless |
| #20 | Yves Rocher | Non Cruelty-Costless |
| #21 | Rexona | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #22 | BeneFit | Non Cruelty-Free |
| #23 | Axe/Lynx/Ego | Non Cruelty-Gratis |
| #24 | Schwarzkopf | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #25 | Natura | Non Cruelty-Free |
| #26 | Fifty'Occitane | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #27 | Neutrogena | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #28 | Lux | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #29 | Old Spice | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #xxx | Sulwhasoo | Not Cruelty-Costless |
| #31 | Elsève/Elvive | Non Cruelty-Gratis |
| #32 | Sunsilk | PETA-approved |
| #33 | Shiseido | Not Cruelty-Gratis |
| #34 | Palmolive | Non Cruelty-Gratis |
| #35 | Biore | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #36 | Fresh | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #37 | Rejoice | Non Cruelty-Costless |
| #38 | Articulate | Not Cruelty-Gratuitous |
| #39 | Kosé | Not Cruelty-Complimentary |
| #40 | Innisfree | Non Cruelty-Costless |
| #41 | La Roche-Posay | Not Cruelty-Costless |
| #42 | Bobbi Brown | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #43 | CHANDO | Not Cruelty-Free |
| #44 | Pola | Not Cruelty-Gratis |
| #45 | Oriflame | Not Cruelty-Costless |
| #46 | Avon | Non Cruelty-Free |
| #47 | TRESemmé | Cruelty-Free |
| #48 | Herbal Essences | PETA-approved |
| #49 | The Trunk Shop | Cruelty-Gratis |
| #50 | Sofina | Not Cruelty-Free |
Why These Numbers?
Animal testing is yet used to appraise safety for corrective products to this day. In the dazzler industry, ane of the chief reasons why big corporations still fund beast testing is related to their presence in Mainland china.
The dazzler market in mainland China is experiencing rapid and massive growth. In 2021 the market there underwent 13.8% annual growth as per Statista. (2) However, in order for beauty brands to sell their products in Cathay, they need to comply with the mandatory animate being testing laws.
There are ways for companies to avert animate being testing while inbound the Chinese market. In 2017, People's republic of china removed the mandatory pre-market animal testing laws for products manufactured inside China. In 2021, they accept extended this law to products manufactured outside of the country. There are notwithstanding exceptions depending on the types of products sold, and companies must comply with strict guidelines.
Some PETA-canonical companies, similar Dove, Herbal Essences, and Sunsilk, have been able to remain cruelty-free while selling their products in China. Others like Garnier and Tresemme, take entirely pulled out of the Chinese marketplace.
The Top 500 Beauty and Personal Care Brands: Animal Testing Statistics
Using our internal data as of October 2021, we take gathered the top 500 dazzler and personal care brands based on consumer interest. Out of 500 brands, we found that 190 (38%) fund fauna testing, and another 38 (seven.6%) are in the grey area, meaning that they have refused to share their complete beast testing policy. This means that 45.6% of the top 500 brands are not cruelty-free, while 54.4% are cruelty-gratis.
When we look at the acme 100 brands based on the aforementioned criteria, at that place's a shift: 65% are not cruelty-costless, while only 35% are cruelty-free. The more than popular and bigger the brands, the more likely they fund animal testing in markets which require it by constabulary.
Popular cruelty-free brands in our database include:
- NYX
- ELF
- Tarte
- Garnier
- The Ordinary
- The Body Shop
- As well faced
- It Cosmetics
- bareMinerals
- Burt's Bees
- Charlotte Tilbury
- Urban Decay
- Essence
35% of Consumers Look For Cruelty-Costless Products
According to a 2019 written report past GlobalData, 35% of consumers actively look for "cruelty-free" claims on beauty products. (3)
Out of all cruelty-complimentary beauty consumers, 73% support cruelty-free brands regardless of the parent visitor'southward policy. This includes brands such as NYX (owned past L'Oreal) or Tarte (endemic by Kose) which are cruelty-free while their parent company is not.
The demand for vegan cosmetics, meaning cosmetics that do non incorporate whatever animal-derived ingredients such as beeswax or carmine, is as well on the rise. Equally of 2021, the global market for vegan cosmetics is estimated at xv.1 billion. (4) We found that 29% of cruelty-complimentary consumers exclusively buy cosmetics that are both cruelty-complimentary and vegan.
The Hereafter of The Cruelty-Gratuitous Dazzler Market
The cruelty-free cosmetics market is estimated to reach 10 billion by 2024 according to Market Enquiry Future. (5) This is largely due to the rising of new and contained brands, nonetheless some of the industry giants are making great efforts for their brands to go cruelty-gratuitous.
In 2019, Covergirl pulled out of the Chinese market in club to avoid any potential animal testing, and received their Leaping Bunny certification. In 2021, Garnier did the same. The process of gaining cruelty-gratuitous certification for large brand isn't easy. In Garnier'southward case, the procedure took 2 years and included vetting over 500 suppliers.
While many big brands are going cruelty-gratis, a small-scale minority are taking the contrary route. In 2017, Shiseido-endemic luxury brand NARS entered the Chinese market, which removed their cruelty-complimentary condition. Before long after, Eve LOM and Elemis were also removed from our cruelty-costless list for the same reason.
These 44* Countries Have Banned Animal Testing For Cosmetics
Every bit of 2021, 44* countries globally have banned animal testing for cosmetics. This includes the European Union (Republic of austria, Kingdom of belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Commonwealth of Republic of cyprus, Czech Democracy, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, French republic, Germany, Hellenic republic, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Republic of lithuania, Luxembourg, Republic of malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Espana and Sweden) every bit well equally:
- Brazil (some states only)
- Colombia
- Norway
- Liechtenstein
- Switzerland
- Republic of iceland
- Guatemala
- Republic of india
- Isreal
- New Zealand
- Taiwan
- Turkey
- Us (some states simply: California, Nevada, Illinois, Maine, Hawaii, Maryland, and Virginia)
- United Kingdom
- Mexico
- Australia
- South korea
This means that 22.five% of counties worldwide have banned animal testing for cosmetics.
In the majority of these cases, the ban applies to the sale of cosmetics that were tested on animals, however these bans don't account for finished products that were tested on animals in other markets.
According to a study past Humane Club International, 70% of people worldwide believe that animal testing for cosmetics should be illegal. The written report polled residents of the United States, Canada, South Korea, Brazil, Japan, and Taiwan.
*Including Brazil and The Unites States, where but some states have banned the practice.
Animals Used Worldwide in Lab Experiments
It's difficult to ascertain the exact number of animals used in safe testing in cosmetics worldwide. Only a scattering of companies report animal testing numbers: Australia, Canada, the Eu, New Zealand, South korea, the Great britain and the Us.
Of these countries, few pause downward the figures into for exactly what purpose lab animals were used. For those that practise, figures are given for overall product safe testing, not specifically for cosmetics.
In the Eu and Norway in 2017, a total of 10,804,854 animals were used for lab experiments, of which 945,424 (8.75%) were for toxicological and safety evaluation of products and ingredients. (6)
In Australia in 2017, a total of xx,160,469 animals were used for lab experiments, of which 17,390 (0.08%) of such experiments were for regulatory production testing. (7)
In Canada in 2019, a total of 4,745,317 animals were used for lab experiments, of which 218,065 (iv.6%) were for regulatory testing of products. (eight)
The U.s., New Zealand, Republic of korea and United Kingdom offer no statistics on the exact purpose of creature testing.
Conclusion
We still have a long way to go in the fight confronting animal testing for cosmetics. Every bit pointed out to a higher place, 44 out of l of the largest cosmetics brands nevertheless fund animal tests, and just 28% of countries worldwide have banned the exercise.
As the demand for cruelty-free cosmetics rises and countries slowly simply surely ban animal testing for cosmetics, we hope that these numbers will change for the ameliorate.
By the Numbers
| Percentage of the top 50 cosmetics brands (past company value) that aren't cruelty-free | 88% (44 / 50) |
| Top 500 beauty and personal care brands: how many are cruelty-free? | 54.four% (272 / 500) |
| Top 500 beauty and personal care brands: how many aren't cruelty-free? | 45.6% (228 / 500) |
| Top 100 beauty and personal care brands: how many are cruelty-free? | 35% (35 / 100) |
| Meridian 100 beauty and personal care brands: how many aren't cruelty-free? | 65% (65 / 100) |
| Consumers that look for cruelty-free claims on product packaging | 35% |
| Consumers that support cruelty-free brands regardless of parent company policy | 79% |
| Size of global vegan cosmetics market in 2021 | USD $15.1B |
| Cruelty-free consumers that exclusively buy cosmetics that are both cruelty-free and vegan | 28% |
| Estimated future size of the cruelty-gratis cosmetics market place in 2024 | USD $10B |
| Countries that ban animate being testing for cosmetics | 22.5% (44 / 195) |
| People worldwide who believe animal testing for cosmetics should exist banned | lxx% |
References
- https://brandirectory.com/download-report/brand-finance-cosmetics-l-2021-preview.pdf
- https://world wide web.statista.com/topics/1897/cosmetics-in-china/
- https://www.globaldata.com/clean-beauty-tendency-getting-attention-with-35-apac-consumers-looking-for-cruelty-free-beauty-products-says-globaldata/
- https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/cruelty-free-cosmetics-market place-3825
- https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210505005544/en/Global-Vegan-Cosmetics-Industry-2020-to-2027---Market-Trajectory-Analytics---ResearchAndMarkets.com
- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0859&from=EN
- https://www.humaneresearch.org.au/2017-australian-statistics-of-creature-utilise-in-research-teaching/
- https://ccac.ca/Documents/AUD/2019-Animate being-Information-Report.pdf
Which Brands Are Cruelty-Free?
Download our listing of 600+ verified cruelty-free brands directly to your device. Bring it with you everywhere you lot go, and never worry about supporting animal testing once again. Click here to download
Source: https://www.crueltyfreekitty.com/news/animal-testing-statistics/
Posted by: rodgerspromptiff.blogspot.com
0 Response to "What Percent Of Products Are Tested On Animals"
Post a Comment